Nobody Read Your Threat Report. Designing Security Research Practitioners Want to Read
Our industry publishes hundreds of "state of" reports, threat landscapes, and security surveys every year. Practitioners ignore most of them. But there are good news for marketers: The report practitioners actually read, cite, and share is also the one that does the most for your brand and your pipeline. Useful and effective are not opposites. But most security research is just more of the same: Recycled dwell-time stats, leading survey questions, "n=12 CISOs" passed off as data, and a single headline number nobody can map to their own environment.This session is a practical design guide for reports and surveys the practitioner actually wants to read. We'll cover survey design that doesn't generate garbage, metrics that survive a skeptical reader, why segmentation beats a scary average, and how to mine the telemetry you already own instead of running another opinion poll. The goal is produce content practitioners trust — which is the only research that earns the awareness and demand you were after in the first place.
Session Agenda
- A guide for identifying the data practitioners need and you can provide
- A practical checklist for commissioning and reviewing survey-based research before it ships
- A simple rule set for presenting metrics so they survive a skeptical, technical reader
- A way to identify the genuinely novel data your organization already owns
Speakers

About this Session's Track
Demand Gen & Digital, GTM Engineering & MOPs
Dive into the latest demand gen, digital tactics, and marketing operations frameworks that drive pipeline growth, from innovative and automated campaigns to AI-driven GTM engineering.